Draft 3 – Peer Review

We finished our draft 3 off of the comments from our previous draft and sent it out to some other students to review.

Student 1:

What works well:

  • Lighting and visual effects such as the layering
  • Overall lighting works well in connoting to the audience how and what the performance in meant to portray (anger/desperation)
  • lip syncing and overall editing phase works well with the sing and narrative
  • performance and narrative is strong and works well with the song
What needs to be fixed:
  • There seems to be an accidentally jump cut at the end of the the video after G lies back down
  • G laughs at the end of the video after lying down, could just cut the video a second before hand
  • not so much about what to fix but a suggestion of lighting and colour gradient the lighting choice in the container
  • changed contrast of the phone scene where G is messaging Jane as when the hook comes around it is timed with Jane screenshotting the chat, which took a closer look to notice
  • drums aren’t always in sync but there not much you can do about that since G was in time
Overall, a really good music video that works well with the song.
Student 2:
What went well:
  • Lip Syncing in time
  • Good use editing
  • Good variety of camera angles
  • Good performance
Constructive Criticism:
  • Maybe too much different effects going on
  • Some clips are very long
  • Don’t use snapchat (maybe messages)

Targets to improve on:

. Maybe look at the effects and sort out what may be too much

. Shorten some clips down

. Rework the messages to look better and more readable in the timeframe they appear for

. Fix the accidental end clip

. Rework our use of color correction

. Rework the clip of the actor lying down at the end

Leave a Reply