Skip to content

Don’t Let’s Go To The Dogs Tonight – Chapters 8 to 12

Chapter 8 – Anecdotal Storyboard

Chapter 9 – How does Fuller create unity between this chapter and the previous one as well as in other parts of the memoir so far?

Ja? Well at least I’ve never had a tick on my downthere’ calls back to the previous chapter, and the anecdote of the tick. This introduces a rare fluidity to the text, as one chapter leads directly into the next, perhaps to remind the reader that they are experiencing the story of one life, no matter how chaotic it may appear. 

Chapter 9 – Comment on her use of detail – especially on place. 

Fuller recalls exact, specific details during this chapter, such as the ‘shiny African waiter with impeccable hands and careful, clean nails’ and the branding of the Coke she drank: ‘‘Adds life’’, implying that these experiences have left a lasting impression on her, and thus are still vivid. For example, describing the waiter with adjectives such as ‘impeccable’ and ‘shiny’ connotes absolute purity, as well as immense value, perhaps significant because they directly defy the stereotype of an African women that Fuller has been fed by her colonial upbringing: a dirty woman worth nothing. Furthermore, the slogan of the coke bottle might have awakened her to how Western culture had been forcibly injected into the native atmosphere, as even in the text it stands out like a sore thumb, surrounded by parenthesis. 

Chapter 10 – How does Fuller portray the increasing danger of living in Rhodesia and nearby Mozambique in 1974. 

Fuller describes 1974 as ‘the year (she) turned five’, drawing special attention to her young age, connoting vulnerability and the notion of a childhood surrounded by war. This idea is reinforced by referring to the length of the civil war like one would a child, calling it ‘8 years old’. This personifies the war, perhaps reflecting her twisted childhood as a result of its roots in the conflict, and by explaining to us that it was around before her birth, she implies that the war could continue long after. 

Chapter 10 – Identify effective writing techniques in the part about landmines. 

The quote ‘If we were killed in an ambush or blown up on a mine, we will be wearing clean brookies, our best dresses’ hints at the privilege of white colonialists in Rhodesia: even in death they are above others, wearing symbols of their wealth and status. Additionally the decision to use the more definitive future tense instead of the conditional in this statement emphasises the severity of the danger she faces everyday, and the high risk of death. 

Furthermore the italicised chant at the bottom of page 55 speaks to Bobo’s desensitisation to violence and war at such a young age. Unlike many who lose their innocence later in life, Bobo never had innocence to lose, as she was raised as a child of war. 

Chapter 11 – How does Fuller identify her parents?

Chapter 12  – Comment on Fuller’s effective portrayal of her mum shooting the Cobra.

Fuller writes that her ‘Mum screams for milk’. The verb ‘scream’ is highly emotive, connoting extreme distress and pain, and therefore depicts a reaction unparalleled to anything we’ve seen from her mother thus far. This could suggest that she cares more for her pets than she does for Bobo and Van, perhaps because she has lost children before and is therefore desensitised to it, but Fuller also informs the reader that the average lifespan for a dog on the farm is very short, so perhaps not. However, it does reinforce the aspect of her personality that is sympathetic to nature.

Thousand Cranes – Minor Textual Analysis

Chosen passage: p.g. 50 ‘I made her die.’ – End of page.

Death is a central, but abstract theme in ‘Thousand Cranes’; the characters’ perception of it is constantly shifting, and, by the end of the novel, no character holds it in the same regard. Kikuji, the protagonist of the novel, experiences several turning points in his personal relationship with death, one of which takes place at the climax of Part I of Figured Shino, upon his discussion of Mrs Ota’s suicide with her daughter Fumiko.

After evading the subject of blame all evening, Kikuji proclaims that ‘(He) made her die’,  a short, simple, declarative statement that acts as a clear admission of his guilt, an admission that opens up a conversation with Fumiko that allows their shared, muddled feelings to flow. The boldness of such emotional vulnerability stands in stark contrast to both traditional Japanese culture, which values conformity and emotional suppression in promotion of better relationships, and Kikuji and Fumiko’s interactions in the novel up to this point. Even when first informing Kikuji of her mother’s suicide, Fumiko did so entirely through euphemism, allowing the subtext to convey the gravity of the situation, and she only did so because she needed his help in covering the situation up, in order to preserve her and her mother’s honour. The verb ‘made’ connotes force, as well as an active effort, implying that Kikuji feels his role in her death was decisive, and had he not interfered with her affairs she would undoubtedly still be alive; he is the sole cause, and it was no accident.

However, Fumiko counters this thought by explaining that to blame anyone would be to make ‘her death seem dirty’. Describing the death with such an adjective, ‘dirty’, could reflect how suicide was considered as morally reprehensible in post-WWII Japanese society, a sinful act, or, it could connote impurity, and therefore suggest that Mrs Ota’s death was a pure act, one of sacrifice that is more reminiscent of the ancient Japanese tradition of seppuku, a ritual suicide preformed to protect one’s honour; to tie blame or guilt to her death would be to taint it with the same negativity that she was trying to vanquish.

After Fumiko goes onto explain that forgiveness is enough for the dead, and as he reflects on this, ‘a curtain in Kikuji’s mind (seems) to disappear.’ He comes to the revelation that ‘The dead did not press moral considerations upon the living’, and thus realises that Fumiko was right: to apportion guilt to himself would be to taint the nobility of Mrs Ota’s death, reinforcing my earlier point. The nouns ‘living’ and ‘dead’ act as classifiers, which denote a clear separation in Kukuji’s head; Mrs Ota is no longer a ghost, an apparition somewhere between the world of the living and the dead that can haunt him, but distinctly dead, thus implying that he is free of the unprocessed emotions he was left with after her passing. Kikuji recognising the threat of guilt to the legacy of Mrs Ota also implies that he has empathy for the dead, something he has not yet displayed towards his father, whose death often crosses his mind, highlighting Kikuji’s growth and development as a character as a result of his evolving perception of death and loss.

 

Don’t Let’s Go To The Dogs Tonight – Chapters 1 to 4

Initial Observations: (In Chronological Order)

  • The epigraph – ‘Don’t let’s go to the dogs tonight, For mother will be there’ – could hint at her mother’s alcoholism, as ‘going to the dogs’ is an expression for going out, but also an expression for getting ruined. The latter part of the epigraph’s meaning could suggest her fear of letting herself go, and following in the footsteps of her mother.
  • Bobo thinking that African time was ‘kind’ in contrast to Britain’s ‘mean’ time reflects how the natural optimism of childhood has influenced her to value her home, Africa, above Britain, the nation that her parents cling on to idealising.
  • ‘A hundred… of us.’ – Her mother’s overt racism displays how fragrantly the white colonisers looked down upon the majority black population, without care for offence, or even self-preservation. This stands in stark contrast to our contemporary society, which is still victim to institutional and personal racism, but in a far more subtle, hidden way, as social etiquette towards race as evolved significantly. Her mother’s view ties into the idea of sub-humanism, and how in her eyes the lives of Kenyans just objectively mean less than white lives, perhaps indicating complete ignorance to this as a problematic attitude, or perhaps instead reflecting her upbringing and education under colonial Britain.
  • Chapter One – The War… Chapter Four – Being Nicola Fuller of Central Africa’ – Bobo’s mother ultimately places greater importance on herself than tragic circumstances such as war or ‘Dead Children’, showcasing her privilege and ego, as well as the spectacle of being a colonial woman in the British Empire.
  • ‘Suitably dramatic’ – Further reinforces the idea of ignorance through her false nobility. The following quote ‘We are prepared to die, you see, to keep one country white-run’ proves that martyrdom and self-sacrifice are not always noble, exploring themes also raised in Persepolis, as Bobo’s mother wishes to give her life for an objectively immoral, even evil, cause.
  • ‘A poetic Shona way of saying ‘War of Liberation’ – The choice of adjective ‘poetic’ suggests that Bobo sees a beauty in the language of the local people, and thus that she admires them. This ties into the idea of the impartial, innocent nature of children, which allows Bobo to respect the native people’s culture.
  • ‘The War drums were brought out from their dark corners and dusted off’ subverts the idea of native savagery held by the white settlers when they came to Africa. This quote indicates that they are not a violent people, and only bring out their weapons to face the already-drawn weapons of the British,
  • ‘Before that, the land was moveable’ – The land is alive, it lived, it had freedom, like the natives. This implies a negative connotation, but ‘It still does’ reminds the reader that human affairs are irrelevant to nature; the African sun shines regardless, so how much power do the British really have against the unchanging cycle of death and rebirth?
  • ‘A corruption of ‘Amatobos” – The choice of noun ‘corruption’ is exactly what the British did, corrupt the native culture. It connotes evil, and twistedness, which is also true of the conquest.

Don’t Let’s Go To The Dogs Tonight – Generic Conventions

Generic Conventions of a Memoir:

  • First person retrospective narrative.
  • Distinct authorial voice.  (Bias)
  • Historical context.
  • Covers a defining period in the author’s life.
  • Chronological order.
  • Anecdotal.
  • Temporal markers.
  • Precise to indicate power of recall.
  • Non-fiction – thus might not follow a traditional narrative structure.
  • Reflective tone.
  • Dialogue.
  • Illustrations, photographs and maps.

The Handmaid’s Tale – Historical Notes

‘Professor Maryann Crescent Moon’ – A unique name reminiscent of Native American culture, perhaps denoting a return to history, and acting in sharp contrast to the regimented ‘Of-‘ prefix names of Gileadean society.

‘As part of our Twelfth Symposium’ – Possible reference to Plato’s ‘The Symposium’, another literary work that seeks to explore the theme of love, first praising it and then defining it. Perhaps Atwood is expanding on a point she made earlier in the novel through Offred, that the regime was built without love, and was therefore tyrannical.

‘(Laughter.)’ – Highlights how as time moves further and further away from a given point in history, tragedy becomes indifference, and eventually, comedy. Everyone has fallen victim to mocking those in the past as we look back with the luxury of hindsight, establishing a point that Atwood develops in the final sentences of the novel.

‘Voices may reach us from it; but what they say to us is imbued with the obscurity of the matrix out of which they come; and try as we may, we cannot always decipher them precisely in the clearer light of our own day.’ – I believe that this closing statement acts as an evaluation of the past, and perhaps even a criticism. As time goes on, do we get too caught up in the academia of studying history that we forget to sympathise with the oppressed?

The Handmaid’s Tale – Chapter 38, 39, & 40

The Symbolic Death of Moira – When we see Moira in Jezebels in chapter 38, we learn that she too has been crushed into docility by the regime, just like everyone else; Offred’s last bastion of hope and revolution is dead. In the next chapter, Offred states that Moira may as well be dead, reflecting how, now that Offred’s heroic image of her is dead, Moira may as well be in the eyes of Offred, as she has betrayed the morals and the rebellious spirt she once swore by.

From annotations: Offred tells one final tale of a rebellious Moira, one that isn’t true, but one that keeps that spirit alive. Metaphorically, she is dead: at least Offred’s perception of her as a hero, a rebel. As a result of this, Offred has one less thing to hope for.

Offred’s First Telling of Her Encounter With Nick  – ‘I’m alive in my skin, again, arms around him, falling and water softly everywhere’ (p.g 263) This reveals the two things Offred dreams of, the two things she has been completely deprived of under the Gileadean regime: love and self-identity. The adjective ‘alive’ in relation to Offred’s body implies a vivid sense of self-belief, which she appears drunk in, and the phrase ‘arms around him’ displays her desire for genuine, meaningful touch, an aspiration that is similar to the Commanders, but while his is muddled and perverse, her desire is innocent and pure. The imagery of the metaphorical water could portray an ultimate freedom that flows between these two desires, something that is underlying, soft, but necessary for them to be enacted upon.

Perfume – Morality In Perfume

When discussing ‘murky morals’, I think one has to clarify what qualities that phrase is actually signifying. In my analysis, it will refer to behaviour presented by the characters of Süskind’s ‘Perfume’ that is dishonest, questionable or morally dubious, and I will be exploring the text through a comparison of, debatably, the protagonist and the antagonist of the novel, Jean-Baptiste Grenouille and Antoine Richis respectively. Both characters, at least to some extent, see others as means to achieve their own goals, but have a vital difference of conscience; Richis is capable of empathy, whereas Grenouille is not.

Süskind portrays Grenouille as exploitative throughout the novel, to the extent of the character’s extended metaphor actually being a parasite. Upon his decision to study the art of perfuming under Giuseppe Baldini, Süskind writes that “the tick has scented blood”, likening Grenouille to an insect that feeds off of the blood of others to sustain itself. The verb “scented”, while also tying into Süskind’s continued semantic field of olfaction, is in the past tense, implying that Grenouille has actively sought out a perfumer to pray on the skills of for his own benefit, and, additionally, that now he has found suitable prey, nothing can stop him from commencing with his plan. The noun “blood” connotes: pain and death, perhaps hinting at the moral extremity of the actions he later commits; as well as the notion of his plan, the metaphorical “blood” he senses, being essential to his being. Without any way forward to achieve his goal, Grenouille would die, as if the blood had been drained from his veins. This presentation of his character infers a sense of animalism, and a primal nature that is driving him to commit any morally dubious act that he needs to further his own ends and, thus, to survive. Therefore, it can be concluded that Grenouille views the other characters of the novel as means to achieve his own ends so strongly, more so than any other character, that his ability to have murky morals becomes questionable; if Grenouille is truly an animal motivated purely by survival instinct, his actions cannot be morally wrong, or even murky, as morality is intrinsically linked with intent, and even his most ‘evil’ actions are committed with purely transactional intentions. 

However, a character that is expected to be moral due to his nature as a father, is Antoine Richis. Although, despite his presumed empathetic ability, the character is presented as another who sees those close to him as means to achieve his own ends when his relationship with Baron de Bouyon is described, a man “with whom Richis had already concluded a contract concerning the future marriage of their children”. The noun “contract” connotes business, and a lack of emotion, as well as painting his daughter as property that, not only does Richis possess entirely, but that he can use as a bargaining tool for societal gain. However, Richis is not only morally dubious enough to reduce his own daughter to inanimate leverage in his own pursuit of power, but he envisions his own daughter as property so extremely that it supersedes their familial connection, recalling an occasion when he “choked on this dreadful lust” that he felt for his own daughter. The noun “lust” implies that her body, Richis’ bargaining tool, was so far removed from being an actual human ,with her own thoughts, feelings, and family, that he was able to sexually desire it. But, the adjective “dreadful” signifies that he was able to reflect on this experience, and appreciate its truly immoral, vile nature, reminding the reader that he is capable of morality, and consciously chooses to ignore it until after the fact, which is perhaps more evil than being unaware of morality entirely. 

I would conclude that, while both men clearly see the other characters of the novel as means to achieve their own ends, Richis is the only character that I have analysed capable of possessing “murky morals”. Moreover, I would suggest that because of this, the ability to possess any kind of morality, Richis could be perceived as more villainous than Grenouille, a man of instinct, as the former cannot be held morally accountable for his misdeeds.

 

Skip to toolbar